This paper, however, critically examines the machinations of public sentiment immediately following a controversial Supreme Court decision. Most scholarship pertaining to the Supreme Court’s “school prayer” cases remains focused solely on Establishment and Free Exercise variables, or the political and moral significance for twenty-first century youths. Schempp (1963) The Court considered whether a Pennsylvania law and policy of the Abington School District requiring public-school students to participate in classroom exercises involving daily Bible verse reading violated the religious freedom of students under the First and Fourteenth. Curlett and the American Mind” examines popular response to Supreme Court action, specifically focusing on the methods used by the majority to manipulate public sentiment for the purpose of counteracting judicial decrees. School District of Abington Township, Pennsylvania v. ![]() ![]() The Supreme Court’s verdict became a target of public outrage, as well as a tool for the dispossession of the disbelieving minority. The prevailing national discourse that emerged during the following school year represented a relatively united organization against the ruling, based primarily on moral, rather than legal, grounds. Schempp, removed the Lord’s Prayer and Bible reading from public schools in 1963. Schempp banned the inclusion of religious. Schempp The ruling of Abington School District v. ![]() Curlett, decided in conjunction with School District of Abington Township v. Lesson Summary Frequently Asked Questions What was the ruling of Abington School District v.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |